Crusader37

Creation, Dinosaurs & The Bible

How old is it??


Myspace Clocks, Video Clocks at WishAFriend.com

http://www.modmyprofile.com/map.php?id=1510536

 
 

550 F CFA

Creation, Dinosaurs & The Bible

 578 views

thank you for making this the top visited site in the country
it is good to expose the truth and to get out the truth that evolution
is nothing more than a hoax and to put doubt into those who want 
to believe such propaganda.  this site has had at last count 421 visitors
everyone needs to know the truth and needs to know that evolution is 
only a hoax & is only propaganda & never happend.but they
want people to believe it because they do, but there is no proof of it.
 
 
 
at last count this site had 432 visitors, tis one below is a picture of the original map
 

Click to zoom in on my visitor map!

this map above is a new map

 
 
 
 
 
http://www.preteristarchive.com/Books/index.html
 
 

Censorship of Information on Origins

 

 

ChemTrails.com - Chemical Trails

Ancient Dinosaur Depictions on Stone 

Artifacts of Live Dinosaurs, Australia’s Aborigines: Did they see dinosaurs

Creation Evidences Museum - Dinosaur Art From Ancient Tombs In Peru

Dinosaur Petroglyphs at Natural Bridges National Monument

Dinosaur Tracks and Giant Men - Dinosaurs in Literature, Art and History

Empirical Evidence that Man and Dinosaurs Lived Together!

Evidence of Dinosaurs in the Twentieth Century Humans and Dinosaurs live at the same time 

Genesis Park - Giants and Dinosaurs Together! - PRAVDA.Ru- Jurassic Park  

Man-Made Dinosaur Images -The Thunderbird Living Fossil or Living Folklore 

TrueAuthority.com - Two Opposing Views of the Paluxy River Tracks 

Walking Amidst the Dinosaurs  April 1976 Resolution

EVOLUTIONARY "OSTRIOLOGICAL" INVESTIGATION -

* GLEN "KUBANISM" FALSIFIED BY EMPIRICAL MAN TRACK EVIDENCE *

HOW EVOLUTION BECAME A RELIGION - CIVIL WAR PTERODACTLS

A LITTLE FISH CHALLENGES A GIANT OF SCIENCE -  "STUDENT'S RIGHT TO KNOW"    

 JACKALOPIAN RECONSTRUCTIVE ANATOMY Defined - National Geographic's Artists 

National Geographic's "IMAGOLUTION OF LIFE IN SPACE"

National Geographic REVEALS THE METAPHYSICAL RELIGION OF COSMOLOGY

"JACKALOPIAN RECONSTRUCTIVE COSMOLOGY" - TWO, "EQUALLY IMAGOLUTIONARY," WORLD VIEWS OF

NASA's IMAGOLUTIONARY "ROCK OF LIFE" - LUCY'S FRAUDULENT FRAME, LUCYISM & EVOLUCYISM

LUCKY'S JACKALOPIAN SKULLDUGGERY - Ms. JACKALOPIAN HOMO ERECTUS X 3 

THE METAPHYSICAL "PATRIARCHS" OF HUMANISM   -  "ORRORIN tugenensis"      

HOMINID CREATION, A "SPIRITUAL PARODY"  -  THE METAPHYSICAL "CREATOR GOD" OF EVOLUTION 

EMPIRICAL "PROOF" MAN & DINOSAURS TOGETHER! Updated

 12,709 YEAR OLD COALIFIED CRETACEOUS TREE - 13,000 YR OLD-CRETACEOUS LIMESTONE

MORE EMPIRICAL PROOFS THAT MAN & DINOSAURS LIVED TOGETHER 

"Mickey Mouse" Examples of Evolution - THE HOATZIN AND "BIOLOGICAL THERMODYNAMICS"

3 ICHTHYOSAUR "MOMMIES" BURIED ALIVE - THERE WERE GIANTS IN THE EARTH

GIANT GIBBONS?? A TALE OF A WHALE - COULD METAMORPHOSIS BE MACRO-EVOLUTION? 

FALSIFICATION OF FOSSILIZATION - GEOLOGIC DATING METHODS "PROFOUNDLY" QUESTIONED

CONTINENTAL D R I F T OR DID THE EARTH EXPAND - THE LADY & THE CARNIVORE 

CREATION "PROFOUNDLY PROVEN TESTABLE" - CAMBRIAN SHOE PRINT & SQUASHED TRILOBITES

GIANT MAN TRACKS - GIGANTIC KANSAS MAN TRACKS - PILTDOWN CHICKEN    

National Geographic's FAKE FLYING DINOSAUR - EVIDENCE OF MAN FOUND IN THE ROCK LAYERS 

NEW FIND! CALIFORNIA SAUROPOD TRACKS - CARBON-14 VERIFIES YOUNG AGE OF DINOSAURS 

RADIO CARBON DATABLE PETRIFIED WOOD EUREKA! SCIENTISTS BREAK THE SPEED OF LIGHT! 

MAMMOTHS ARE NOT EXTINCT THE MICRO-EVOLUTION OF ELEPHANTS 

ARE (STONE AGE) TOOLS ANCIENT OR RECENT? DID THE ANASAZI INDIANS LIVE WITH DINOSAURS?? 

ACAMBARO FIGURINES - MYSTERY OF ACAMBARO VIDEO - THE DINOSAUR BURIAL STONES OF ICA PERU

NeW 2006 ICA STONE PICTURES  - THE CERAMIC DINOSAURS OF ICA PERU - PERU "DINOSAUR" POTTERY     

MYSTERIES OF SOUTH AMERICA VIDEO - THE PTEROSAUR & GIANT HUMAN PICTOGRAPHS IN UTAH 

WHY SCALES COULD NEVER BECAME "SCETHERS" LIVING "FOSSIL" GLIDING REPTILES    

PROTOAVIS OR PSEUDO-AVIS - FUZZY WUZZY FAIRY TALE - ARCHAEOPTERYX & JACKALOPIAN IMAGOLUTIONISM 

METHANEOSAURUS - A FLYING DINOSAUR? - HOW JACKALOPIAN RECONSTRUCTED DINOSAURS ARE MADE 

HANDPRINT IN CRETACEOUS LIMESTONE EMPIRICAL PHOTOGRAPHIC EVIDENCE OF MAN

ONLY "MODERN" FOSSIL HUMAN FOOTPRINTS - LIVING TRILOBITES?    

THE NEW "TURNAGE-PATTON (DINOSAUR) TRAIL"  -

COLORADO COAL MINE DINOSAUR TRACKS EDUCATIONAL & SCIENTIFIC PARADOX


OTHER CREATION WEB SITE LINKS - THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES  

EVOLUTIONARY "OSTRIOLOGICAL" INVESTIGATION

* GLEN "KUBANISM" FALSIFIED BY EMPIRICAL MAN TRACK EVIDENCE *

HOW EVOLUTION BECAME A RELIGION - CIVIL WAR PTERODACTLS - THE TWO BIBLES

A LITTLE FISH CHALLENGES A GIANT OF SCIENCE - "STUDENT'S RIGHT TO KNOW"

JACKALOPIAN RECONSTRUCTIVE ANATOMY Defined - "JACKALOPIAN NEANDERTHALS"

National Geographic's JACKALOPIAN Artists National Geographic's "IMAGOLUTION OF LIFE IN SPACE"

National Geographic Society  "JACKALOPIAN RECONSTRUCTIVE COSMOLOGY"

TWO, "EQUALLY IMAGOLUTIONARY," WORLD VIEWS OF THE BIRTH & DEATH OF OUR SUN & SOLAR SYSTEM

NASA's IMAGOLUTIONARY "ROCK OF LIFE"

 
 
 
Kent Hovind (b. 1953) - fundamentalist independent Baptist. Known as "Dr. Dino," he
produces anti-evolution tracts for Jack Chick and is head of Creation Science Evangelism.
Recongizable for his harsh, abrasive tone and considered something of a renegade,
Hovind's arguments for young-earth creation have drawn criticism from other
young-earth organizations. Some of his more controversial beliefs include Baugh's
canopy theory and a Christian variation of astrology. Title: Claws, Jaws, and Dinosaurs.
And he has never been proven wrong, the crybaby evolutionists dont like it that they are wrong.
 

Biblical Studies - The flood in the Days of Noah - Pumpkin37  Petrified Wood -

Noah's Ark expedition - Evolution Deceit. com - The way of the master

 
 
 

High Level Government Support for Creation | Imagine Artificial Intelligence 

The Whether: No One Talks About It, But Everyone Does Something About It 

Kangaroo Ica Stones from Peru | From Religion to Atheism to Truth | Flores Man: Tiny Human Cousins? 

A Universe with a Beginning | The Newly Discovered Transitional Fish 

Please Don't Annoy Dying Darwin | 3000 Darwin Skeptics |

Dr. Hale's Home Remedy and Recipe Book |

Judge Cooper Rules Conservative Christians Second Class Citizens and Political Outsiders 

Some Facts About the Scopes Trial  | The Genetic On-Off Switch  |

The Creation of New Butterfly Species  | Creation-Evolution Debate: Dr. John T. Robinson vs. Dr. Duane T. Gish 

Creationism is Taught in Our Schools as Long as it is Propaganda Against The Creation 

Worldview | Aptamters Point to a Designer | Discriminatory Harassment in the Name of Science 

Intelligent Design and the Human Brain | Why I No Longer Debate Darwinists in Internet Chat Rooms | 

Crisis At RAE - Carol Geer Tragedy  |WBGSU Radio Interview on Religious Discrimination Against Creationists  | Nobel Laureate: No Inherent Conflict between Science and Religion  |

The Rapid Formation of Petroleum |

Polystrate Fossils at Joggins, Nova Scotia | Does the Heart "Think?" |

 WEXL Radio Interview on Religious Discrimination  |

 Evolving the Flagellum and the Climbing of "Mt. Improbable" |

 Bringing the Message of Creation to South Africa  |

Darwinism and Indoctrination by Our Public Schools |

Plants Show Alternative to Survival of the Fittest  |

Intolerance in America: The Case History of a Creationist |

The Overselling of Whale Evolution  A Brief Second Response to Lippard  |

Was Creationism Involved the State Closure of Columbia Pacific University?  |

Gorges Formed by Rapid Flooding  | Famous Dinosaurs to Debunk Evolution  |

Should Evolution be Immune to Critical Analysis? | Dinosaur and Human Track Excavation at the Paluxy River  |

Kitty Copying and Evolution | Esau's Wives | Henke, Ph.D |

Robofish: a Product of Design, not Evolution  |

Problems with Ethics in an Evolutionary/Materialistic World View | The Flood Film Project: 2004 Update  |

New RATE Data Support A Young World | Artificial Life Yet Again   Stanley Miller's Experiment |

Ramidus vs. Orrorin | Response to Paul Gross' Article on Intelligent Design (Science Insights) |

 Ancient Ice | A View of Creation | The Golden Number | Artificial Life Yet Again 

The Massachusetts Constitution: A Model For Public Education from the Hand of John Adams 

An Evaluation of Alleged Misquoting by Creationists  |

Christianity Provided the Foundation for Science Through the Ages  |

Still No Explanation for the "Cambrian Explosion" | A Mistaken Case Of Macroevolution  |

The Limits of Microevolution | Does Nothing in Biology Make Sense Except in the Light of Evolution? |

 A Creationist's Story: My Life in Science and Education | Interview with Laurence Tisdall  |

The King James Bible teachs Young Earth Creation by the LORD Jesus Christ  |

 A report on ICC 2003  | Is the Darwinists Claim that the Bible Condones Slavery Accurate?  |

 

Question:   How old is the earth?"

Answer: 
 
Given the fact that, according to the Bible, Adam was created on the sixth day of our
planet’s existence, we can determine a Biblically-based, approximate age for the earth
by looking at the chronological details of the human race. This of course assumes that the
Genesis account is accurate, that the six days of creation described in Genesis were
literal 24-hour periods, and that there
were no ambiguous chronological gaps.
 
The genealogies listed in Genesis chapters five and eleven provide the age at which
Adam and his descendants each begot the next generation in a successive ancestral line
from Adam to Abraham. By determining where Abraham fits into history chronologically and by
adding up the ages provided in
Genesis chapters five and eleven, it becomes apparent that the Bible teaches the earth
to be about 6,000 years old, give or take a hundred years or so.
 
What about the popular age of about 4.6 billion years accepted by most scientists
today and taught in the vast majority of our academic institutions? This age is
primarily derived from two dating techniques: radiometric dating and the geologic timescale.
Scientists who advocate the younger age of about 6,000 years insist that radiometric dating is
flawed in that it is founded upon a series of faulty assumptions while the geologic timescale is
flawed in that it employs circular reasoning [see our articles on radiometric dating and the
geologic timescale]. Moreover, they point to the debunking of old-earth myths, like the popular
misconception that it takes long periods of time for stratification, fossilization
and the formation of diamonds, coal, oil, stalactites, stalagmites, etc, to occur. Finally,
young-earth advocates present positive evidence for a young age for the earth in place of
the old-earth evidences which they debunk [see our article on evidences for a young earth].
Young-earth scientists acknowledge that they are in the minority today but insist that their ranks will
swell over time as more and more scientists reexamine the evidence and take a closer look at the
currently accepted old-earth paradigm.
 
Ultimately, the age of the earth cannot be proven. Whether 6,000 years or 4.6 billion years –
both viewpoints (and everything in between) rests on faith and assumptions.
Those who hold to 4.6 billion years trust that methods such as radiometric
dating are reliable, and that nothing has occurred in history that may have disrupted
the normal decay of radio-isotopes. Those who hold to 6,000 years trust that the Bible is true,
and that other factors explain the “apparent” age of the earth, such as the global flood,
or God creating the universe in a state that “appears” to give it an very long age. As an example,
 God created Adam and Eve as fully-grown adult human beings. If a doctor were to have
examined Adam and Eve on the day of their creation, the doctor would have estimated their
age at 20 years (or whatever age they appeared to be) - when, in fact, Adam and Eve were
less than one day old. Whatever the case, it's always good reason to trust the Word of God over
the words of atheistic scientists with an evolutionary agenda.

Question:  "Does Genesis chapter 1 literally mean 24-hour days?” 

 

Answer The English word "day" can mean more than one thing.

It can refer to the 24-hour period of time that it takes for the earth to rotate

on it's axis (i.e. "there are 24-hours in a day"). It can refer to the period of

daylight between dawn and dusk (i.e. "it gets pretty hot during the day but it cools down

a bit at night"). And it can refer to a unspecified period of time

(i.e. "back in my Grandfather's day..."). Likewise, the Hebrew word "yom"

(which translates into the English "day") can mean more than one thing.

 It is used to refer to a 24-hour period in Genesis 7:11. It is used to refer to the

period of daylight between dawn and dusk in Genesis 1:16. And it is used to

refer to an unspecified period of time in Genesis 2:4. So what does it mean in

Genesis 1:5-2:2 when it's used in conjunction with ordinal numbers (i.e. " the first day,

" & " the second day,"  & "the third day," & " the forth day," " the fifth day,"

" the sixth day," and "the seventh day")? Are these 24-hour periods or

something else? Could "yom" as it is used here

mean an unspecified period of time? How can we tell?

 

Yes we can determine how "yom" should be interpreted in Genesis 1:5-2:2 simply by

examining the context in which we find the word used and then comparing it's context with how

we see its usage elsewhere throughout scripture. By doing this we let Scripture interpret itself.

Ken Ham of Answers in Genesis wrote a good article on this. It's published at - http://www.answersingenesis.org/cec/study_guides/answersSG2.pdf

Mr. Ham writes, "The Hebrew word

for day (yom) is used 2301 times in the Old Testament. Outside of Genesis 1:

Yom + ordinal number (used 410 times) always indicates an ordinary day

[i.e. a 24-hour period]. The words ‘evening’ and ‘morning’ together (38 times)

always indicate an ordinary day. Yom + ‘evening’ or ‘morning’ (23 times each)

always indicates an ordinary day. Yom + ‘night’ (52 times) always indicates

an ordinary day."

 

Now let’s look at the context in which we find the word "yom" used in Genesis 1:5-2:2...

 

Day 1 -

"And God called the light 'day' [yom] and the

darkness he called 'night.' So the EVENING and the MORNING were the

FIRST DAY [yom]." (Genesis 1:5)

 

Day 2 -

"So God called the firmament 'Heaven.' So the EVENING and the

MORNING were the SECOND DAY [yom]." (Genesis 1:8)

 

Day 3 -

"So the EVENING and the MORNING were the THIRD DAY [yom]." (Genesis 1:13)

 

Day 4 -

"So the EVENING and the MORNING were the FOURTH DAY [yom]." (Genesis 1:19)

 

Day 5 -

"So the EVENING and the MORNING were the FIFTH DAY [yom]." (Genesis 1:23)

 

Day 6 -

"Then God saw everything that He had made, and indeed it was very good.

So the EVENING and the

MORNING were the SIXTH DAY [yom]." (Genesis 1:31)

 

Day 7 -

"Thus the heavens and the earth, and all the host of them, were finished.

And on the SEVENTH DAY [yom] God ended His work which He had done,

and He rested on the SEVENTH DAY [yom] from all His

work which He had done." (Genesis 2:1-2)

 

It is quite clear by the context that the Author of Genesis chapter 1 meant 24-hour periods.

This was the standard interpretation up until the 1800s when a paradigm shift occurred

within the scientific community and the Earth's sedimentary strata layers were reinterpreted.

Whereas previously the rock layers were interpreted as evidence for Noah's flood,

Noah's flood was thrown out by the scientific community and the rock layers were

reinterpreted as evidence for an excessively old earth. Some well meaning but terribly

mistaken Christians then sought to reconcile this new anti-Flood, ant-Bible interpretation

with the Genesis 1 account by reinterpreting "yom" as meaning vast unspecified periods of time.

This was a mistake.

 

The truth is, the evidences in favor of Noah's flood and a young earth far

outnumber those in favor of an old earth and many of the old earth

interpretations are known to rely upon faulty assumptions.

Unfortunately the scientific community is entrenched on the matter

and apparently they refuse to change their minds despite the

weight of evidence contrary to their currently accepted paradigm.

But please don't let their stubborn refusal influence how you read your Bible!

According to Exodus 20:9-11, God used six literal days to create the world

in order to serve as a model for man's work week. Work six days, rest one.

Rest assured, God could have created everything in an instant if He wanted to. But

apparently He had us in mind even before He made us (on the sixth day) and wanted

to provide an example for us to follow    

  

 

 

Copyright = John Denton. Bible Research & Investigation Co.
URL web page address: http://www.ftech.net/~bric
E Mail address:
denton@bric.ftech.co.uk
 

Genesis 1:2 Parallel Translations

           
NASB:

The earth was formless and void, and

darkness was over the surface of the deep, and the Spirit of God was moving over the surface of the waters. (NASB (C)1995)

GWT:

The earth was formless and empty, and

darkness covered the deep water. The Spirit of God was hovering over the water.(GOD'S WORD(R))

KJV: And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.
ASV: And the earth was waste and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep: and the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.
BBE: And the earth was waste and without form; and it was dark on the face of the deep: and the Spirit of God was moving on the face of the waters.
DBY: And the earth was waste and empty, and darkness was on the face of the deep, and the Spirit of God was hovering over the face of the waters.
ERV: And the earth was waste and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep: and the spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.
JPS: Now the earth was unformed and void, and darkness was upon the face of the deep; and the spirit of God hovered over the face of the waters.
WBS: And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep: and the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.
WEB: Now the earth was formless and empty. Darkness was on the surface of the deep. God's Spirit was hovering over the surface of the waters.
YLT: the earth hath existed waste and void, and darkness is on the face of the deep, and the Spirit of God fluttering on the face of the waters,
Genesis 1:2 Cross References
XREF: Deuteronomy 32:11 "Like an eagle that stirs up its nest, That hovers over its young, He spread His wings and caught them, He carried them on His pinions.

Job 38:9 When I made a cloud its garment And thick darkness its swaddling band,

Psalm 104:30 You send forth Your Spirit, they are created; And You renew the face of the ground.

Isaiah 31:5 Like flying birds so the LORD of hosts will protect Jerusalem. He will protect and deliver it; He will pass over and rescue it.

Isaiah 40:13 Who has directed the Spirit of the LORD, Or as His counselor has informed Him?

Isaiah 40:14 With whom did He consult and who gave Him understanding? And who taught Him in the path of justice and taught Him knowledge And informed Him of the way of understanding?

Jeremiah 4:23 I looked on the earth, and behold, it was formless and void; And to the heavens, and they had no light. (NASB (C)1995)
Commentaries and Concordances
GSB: 1:2 And the earth was {b} without form, and void; and {c} darkness [was] upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God {d} moved upon the face of the waters.
(b) As an unformed lump and without any creature in it: for the waters covered everything.
(c) Darkness covered the deep waters, for the waters covered everything.
(d) He maintained this disordered mass by his secret power.
WES: 1:2 Where we have an account of the first matter, and the first Mover.
1. A chaos was the first matter. 'Tis here called the earth, (tho' the earth, properly taken, was not made 'till the third day, Ge 1:10) because it did most resemble that which was afterwards called earth, a heavy unwieldy mass. 'Tis also called the deep, both for its vastness, and because the waters which were afterwards separated from the earth were now mixed with it. This mighty bulk of matter was it, out of which all bodies were afterwards produced. The Creator could have made his work perfect at first, but by this gradual proceeding he would shew what is ordinarily the method of his providence, and grace. This chaos, was without form and void. Tohu and Bohu, confusion and emptiness, so those words are rendered, Isa 34:11. 'Twas shapeless, 'twas useless, 'twas without inhabitants, without ornaments; the shadow or rough draught of things to come. To those who have their hearts in heaven, this lower world, in comparison of the upper, still appears to be confusion and emptiness. And darkness was upon the face of the deep - God did not create this darkness, (as he is said to create the darkness of affliction, Isa 45:7.) for it was only the want of light.
2. The Spirit of God was the first Mover; He moved upon the face of the waters - He moved upon the face of the deep, as the hen gathereth her chicken under her wings, and hovers over them, to warm and cherish them, Mt 23:37 as the eagle stirs up her nest, and fluttereth over her young, ('tis the same word that is here used) Deut 32:11.
MHC: 1:1,2 The first verse of the Bible gives us a satisfying and useful account of the origin of the earth and the heavens. The faith of humble Christians understands this better than the fancy of the most learned men. From what we see of heaven and earth, we learn the power of the great Creator. And let our make and place as men, remind us of our duty as Christians, always to keep heaven in our eye, and the earth under our feet. The Son of God, one with the Father, was with him when he made the world; nay, we are often told that the world was made by him, and nothing was made without him. Oh, what high thoughts should there be in our minds, of that great God whom we worship, and of that great Mediator in whose name we pray! And here, at the beginning of the sacred volume, we read of that Divine Spirit, whose work upon the heart of man is so often mentioned in other parts of the Bible. Observe, that at first there was nothing desirable to be seen, for the world was without form, and void; it was confusion, and emptiness. In like manner the work of grace in the soul is a new creation: and in a graceless soul, one that is not born again, there is disorder, confusion, and every evil work: it is empty of all good, for it is without God; it is dark, it is darkness itself: this is our condition by nature, till Almighty grace works a change in us.
CONC: Dark Darkness Deep Empty Existed Face Fluttering Form Formless God's Hovered Hovering Moved Moving Spirit Surface Unformed Void Waste Waters
PREV: Dark Darkness Deep Earth Empty Existed Face Fluttering Form Formless God's Hovered Hovering Moved Moving Spirit Surface Unformed Void Waste Waters
NEXT: Dark Darkness Deep Earth Empty Existed Face Fluttering Form Formless God's Hovered Hovering Moved Moving Spirit Surface Unformed Void Waste Waters
 
 

" I love my work with a frenetic and perverse love,

   as an ascetic loves the hair shirt which scratches his belly."
  - Gustave Flaubert

 
 
 
God is a God of righteousness
God sits on the throne
God is strong in battle
God is God alone
God wise and merciful
God is soverign Lord
God is pure and holy
God reigns forever more
 
He's a great God, a righteous King
Ruler over everything
He's a great God, we will proclaim
Honor and glory to his name

God holds up the universe
God sustains the soul
God exalts and God puts down
God is in control
God's glory is eternal
God is love and peace
God knows all, sees all, is all
God is to be praised
 
Blessing and glory and wisdom
Thanksgiving and honor and power and might
Be to our God forever and ever
 
 
hol0030
 
 
 

 
(March 15) - Another conspiracy theory surrounding President Barack Obama is making the rounds, according to Politico.com.
 
The latest one contends that many top officials in Obama's administration are involved in a clandestine global cabal bent on creating a one-world government that supersedes the United States.
For decades, conspiracy theorists have viewed the Bilderberg group, an international organization made up of political, financial, academic and military heavyweights that comes together annually to discuss world affairs, as similar to the Trilateral Commission or the Council on Foreign Relations -- two groups comprised of influential movers and shakers who, some say, control world events from behind the scenes.
And now, some in the Obama administration who have taken part in Bilderberg conferences in the past are gaining attention for their alleged involvement in a secret bid for worldwide domination.
Kansas Gov. Kathleen Sebelius, a Bilderberg participant who was recently nominated by Obama for the Health and Human Services secretary post, is the latest high-profile figure to be singled out.

Skip over this content

One conspiracy-minded Web site called PrisonPlanet.com said that if confirmed, Sebelius "will be pleased to do the bidding of the Bilderbergers in the Obama administration."
The fact that other top members of the Obama team -- economists Timothy Geithner, Larry Summers and Paul Volcker -- have participated in Bilderberg conferences has only added fuel to the fire.
This latest theory comes just weeks after AOL ran a story about the Birthers, a group of conservatives who believe Obama is ineligible to be president because of alleged questions surrounding his birth status.

 

here is Garfield pretending to be an evolutionists...  hehehe.. yes  .. it is sad, but it is true

 
 
 
 

 

Word of the Day

Article of the Day

This Day in History

Today's Birthday

In the News

Quote of the Day

 

 

 

Creation/ Genesis links

 
Oldest Tree The oldest known tree in the world is the bristlecone pine.
Two specimens in the western United States are 4,723 years old (Methuselah, discovered in 1957 in the White Mountains of California) and 4,950 years old (Prometheus, cut down in 1964 on Mt. Wheeler, Nevada). That puts Prometheus at about 638 years before the Flood 4,400 yrs ago, and Methuselah at about 418 years before the Flood. 

The Ancient Forest. ( above ) Each Bristlecone pine, from young seedling to ancient relic, has an individual character. And in the Ancient Forest, where trees had more that four and a half millennia to develop their character, each tree is a true individual. Every single tree in the Ancient Forest is at least 4,000 years old, many reach 4,500 years and the oldest one – Methuselah – has a confirmed age of 4,767 years which secured its place in the Guinness Book of World Records.



 

eric hovind

 
 
E-Mail us at bible@bible.ca
 
 
 

               

 

Glittering Comments from FLMNetwork.com

 

Crusader37