Myspace Clocks, Video Clocks at WishAFriend.com
http://www.modmyprofile.com/map.php?id=1510536
578 views


Censorship of Information on Origins
ChemTrails.com - Chemical Trails
Ancient Dinosaur Depictions on Stone
Artifacts of Live Dinosaurs, Australia’s Aborigines: Did they see dinosaurs
Creation Evidences Museum - Dinosaur Art From Ancient Tombs In Peru
Dinosaur Petroglyphs at Natural Bridges National Monument
Dinosaur Tracks and Giant Men - Dinosaurs in Literature, Art and History
Empirical Evidence that Man and Dinosaurs Lived Together!
Evidence of Dinosaurs in the Twentieth Century - Humans and Dinosaurs live at the same time
Genesis Park - Giants and Dinosaurs Together! - PRAVDA.Ru ) - Jurassic Park
Man-Made Dinosaur Images -The Thunderbird Living Fossil or Living Folklore
TrueAuthority.com - Two Opposing Views of the Paluxy River Tracks
Walking Amidst the Dinosaurs - April 1976 Resolution
EVOLUTIONARY "OSTRIOLOGICAL" INVESTIGATION -* GLEN "KUBANISM" FALSIFIED BY EMPIRICAL MAN TRACK EVIDENCE *
HOW EVOLUTION BECAME A RELIGION - CIVIL WAR PTERODACTLS
A LITTLE FISH CHALLENGES A GIANT OF SCIENCE - "STUDENT'S RIGHT TO KNOW"
JACKALOPIAN RECONSTRUCTIVE ANATOMY Defined - National Geographic's Artists
National Geographic's "IMAGOLUTION OF LIFE IN SPACE"
National Geographic REVEALS THE METAPHYSICAL RELIGION OF COSMOLOGY
"JACKALOPIAN RECONSTRUCTIVE COSMOLOGY" - TWO, "EQUALLY IMAGOLUTIONARY," WORLD VIEWS OF
NASA's IMAGOLUTIONARY "ROCK OF LIFE" - LUCY'S FRAUDULENT FRAME, LUCYISM & EVOLUCYISM
LUCKY'S JACKALOPIAN SKULLDUGGERY - Ms. JACKALOPIAN HOMO ERECTUS X 3
THE METAPHYSICAL "PATRIARCHS" OF HUMANISM - "ORRORIN tugenensis"
HOMINID CREATION, A "SPIRITUAL PARODY" - THE METAPHYSICAL "CREATOR GOD" OF EVOLUTION
EMPIRICAL "PROOF" MAN & DINOSAURS TOGETHER! Updated
12,709 YEAR OLD COALIFIED CRETACEOUS TREE - 13,000 YR OLD-CRETACEOUS LIMESTONE
MORE EMPIRICAL PROOFS THAT MAN & DINOSAURS LIVED TOGETHER
"Mickey Mouse" Examples of Evolution - THE HOATZIN AND "BIOLOGICAL THERMODYNAMICS"
3 ICHTHYOSAUR "MOMMIES" BURIED ALIVE - THERE WERE GIANTS IN THE EARTH
GIANT GIBBONS?? - A TALE OF A WHALE - COULD METAMORPHOSIS BE MACRO-EVOLUTION?
FALSIFICATION OF FOSSILIZATION - GEOLOGIC DATING METHODS "PROFOUNDLY" QUESTIONED
CONTINENTAL D R I F T OR DID THE EARTH EXPAND - THE LADY & THE CARNIVORE
CREATION "PROFOUNDLY PROVEN TESTABLE" - CAMBRIAN SHOE PRINT & SQUASHED TRILOBITES
GIANT MAN TRACKS - GIGANTIC KANSAS MAN TRACKS - PILTDOWN CHICKEN
National Geographic's FAKE FLYING DINOSAUR - EVIDENCE OF MAN FOUND IN THE ROCK LAYERS
NEW FIND! CALIFORNIA SAUROPOD TRACKS - CARBON-14 VERIFIES YOUNG AGE OF DINOSAURS
RADIO CARBON DATABLE PETRIFIED WOOD - EUREKA! SCIENTISTS BREAK THE SPEED OF LIGHT!
MAMMOTHS ARE NOT EXTINCT - THE MICRO-EVOLUTION OF ELEPHANTS
ARE (STONE AGE) TOOLS ANCIENT OR RECENT? - DID THE ANASAZI INDIANS LIVE WITH DINOSAURS??
ACAMBARO FIGURINES - MYSTERY OF ACAMBARO VIDEO - THE DINOSAUR BURIAL STONES OF ICA PERU
NeW 2006 ICA STONE PICTURES - THE CERAMIC DINOSAURS OF ICA PERU - PERU "DINOSAUR" POTTERY
MYSTERIES OF SOUTH AMERICA VIDEO - THE PTEROSAUR & GIANT HUMAN PICTOGRAPHS IN UTAH
WHY SCALES COULD NEVER BECAME "SCETHERS" - LIVING "FOSSIL" GLIDING REPTILES
PROTOAVIS OR PSEUDO-AVIS - FUZZY WUZZY FAIRY TALE - ARCHAEOPTERYX & JACKALOPIAN IMAGOLUTIONISM
METHANEOSAURUS - A FLYING DINOSAUR? - HOW JACKALOPIAN RECONSTRUCTED DINOSAURS ARE MADE
HANDPRINT IN CRETACEOUS LIMESTONE - EMPIRICAL PHOTOGRAPHIC EVIDENCE OF MAN
ONLY "MODERN" FOSSIL HUMAN FOOTPRINTS - LIVING TRILOBITES?
THE NEW "TURNAGE-PATTON (DINOSAUR) TRAIL" -
COLORADO COAL MINE DINOSAUR TRACKS EDUCATIONAL & SCIENTIFIC PARADOX
OTHER CREATION WEB SITE LINKS - THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES
EVOLUTIONARY "OSTRIOLOGICAL" INVESTIGATION
* GLEN "KUBANISM" FALSIFIED BY EMPIRICAL MAN TRACK EVIDENCE *
HOW EVOLUTION BECAME A RELIGION - CIVIL WAR PTERODACTLS - THE TWO BIBLES
A LITTLE FISH CHALLENGES A GIANT OF SCIENCE - "STUDENT'S RIGHT TO KNOW"
JACKALOPIAN RECONSTRUCTIVE ANATOMY Defined - "JACKALOPIAN NEANDERTHALS"
National Geographic's JACKALOPIAN Artists - National Geographic's "IMAGOLUTION OF LIFE IN SPACE"
National Geographic Society - "JACKALOPIAN RECONSTRUCTIVE COSMOLOGY"
TWO, "EQUALLY IMAGOLUTIONARY," WORLD VIEWS OF THE BIRTH & DEATH OF OUR SUN & SOLAR SYSTEM
|
produces anti-evolution tracts for Jack Chick and is head of Creation Science Evangelism.
Recongizable for his harsh, abrasive tone and considered something of a renegade,
Hovind's arguments for young-earth creation have drawn criticism from other
young-earth organizations. Some of his more controversial beliefs include Baugh's
canopy theory and a Christian variation of astrology. Title: Claws, Jaws, and Dinosaurs.
And he has never been proven wrong, the crybaby evolutionists dont like it that they are wrong.
Biblical Studies - The flood in the Days of Noah - Pumpkin37 Petrified Wood -Noah's Ark expedition - Evolution Deceit. com - The way of the master High Level Government Support for Creation | Imagine Artificial Intelligence The Whether: No One Talks About It, But Everyone Does Something About It Kangaroo Ica Stones from Peru | From Religion to Atheism to Truth | Flores Man: Tiny Human Cousins? A Universe with a Beginning | The Newly Discovered Transitional Fish Please Don't Annoy Dying Darwin | 3000 Darwin Skeptics | Dr. Hale's Home Remedy and Recipe Book | Judge Cooper Rules Conservative Christians Second Class Citizens and Political Outsiders Some Facts About the Scopes Trial | The Genetic On-Off Switch | The Creation of New Butterfly Species | Creation-Evolution Debate: Dr. John T. Robinson vs. Dr. Duane T. Gish Creationism is Taught in Our Schools as Long as it is Propaganda Against The Creation Worldview | Aptamters Point to a Designer | Discriminatory Harassment in the Name of Science Intelligent Design and the Human Brain | Why I No Longer Debate Darwinists in Internet Chat Rooms | Crisis At RAE - Carol Geer Tragedy |WBGSU Radio Interview on Religious Discrimination Against Creationists | Nobel Laureate: No Inherent Conflict between Science and Religion | The Rapid Formation of Petroleum | Polystrate Fossils at Joggins, Nova Scotia | Does the Heart "Think?" | WEXL Radio Interview on Religious Discrimination | Evolving the Flagellum and the Climbing of "Mt. Improbable" | Bringing the Message of Creation to South Africa | Darwinism and Indoctrination by Our Public Schools | Plants Show Alternative to Survival of the Fittest | Intolerance in America: The Case History of a Creationist | The Overselling of Whale Evolution | A Brief Second Response to Lippard | Was Creationism Involved the State Closure of Columbia Pacific University? | Gorges Formed by Rapid Flooding | Famous Dinosaurs to Debunk Evolution | Should Evolution be Immune to Critical Analysis? | Dinosaur and Human Track Excavation at the Paluxy River | Kitty Copying and Evolution | Esau's Wives | Henke, Ph.D | Robofish: a Product of Design, not Evolution | Problems with Ethics in an Evolutionary/Materialistic World View | The Flood Film Project: 2004 Update | New RATE Data Support A Young World | Artificial Life Yet Again Stanley Miller's Experiment | Ramidus vs. Orrorin | Response to Paul Gross' Article on Intelligent Design (Science Insights) | Ancient Ice | A View of Creation | The Golden Number | Artificial Life Yet Again The Massachusetts Constitution: A Model For Public Education from the Hand of John Adams An Evaluation of Alleged Misquoting by Creationists | Christianity Provided the Foundation for Science Through the Ages | Still No Explanation for the "Cambrian Explosion" | A Mistaken Case Of Macroevolution | The Limits of Microevolution | Does Nothing in Biology Make Sense Except in the Light of Evolution? | A Creationist's Story: My Life in Science and Education | Interview with Laurence Tisdall | The King James Bible teachs Young Earth Creation by the LORD Jesus Christ | A report on ICC 2003 | Is the Darwinists Claim that the Bible Condones Slavery Accurate? |
Question: How old is the earth?" Answer:
Given the fact that, according to the Bible, Adam was created on the sixth day of our
planet’s existence, we can determine a Biblically-based, approximate age for the earth
by looking at the chronological details of the human race. This of course assumes that the
Genesis account is accurate, that the six days of creation described in Genesis were
literal 24-hour periods, and that there
were no ambiguous chronological gaps.
The genealogies listed in Genesis chapters five and eleven provide the age at which
Adam and his descendants each begot the next generation in a successive ancestral line
from Adam to Abraham. By determining where Abraham fits into history chronologically and by
adding up the ages provided in
Genesis chapters five and eleven, it becomes apparent that the Bible teaches the earth
to be about 6,000 years old, give or take a hundred years or so.
What about the popular age of about 4.6 billion years accepted by most scientists
today and taught in the vast majority of our academic institutions? This age is
primarily derived from two dating techniques: radiometric dating and the geologic timescale.
Scientists who advocate the younger age of about 6,000 years insist that radiometric dating is
flawed in that it is founded upon a series of faulty assumptions while the geologic timescale is
flawed in that it employs circular reasoning [see our articles on radiometric dating and the
geologic timescale]. Moreover, they point to the debunking of old-earth myths, like the popular
misconception that it takes long periods of time for stratification, fossilization
and the formation of diamonds, coal, oil, stalactites, stalagmites, etc, to occur. Finally,
young-earth advocates present positive evidence for a young age for the earth in place of
the old-earth evidences which they debunk [see our article on evidences for a young earth].
Young-earth scientists acknowledge that they are in the minority today but insist that their ranks will
swell over time as more and more scientists reexamine the evidence and take a closer look at the
currently accepted old-earth paradigm.
Ultimately, the age of the earth cannot be proven. Whether 6,000 years or 4.6 billion years –
both viewpoints (and everything in between) rests on faith and assumptions.
Those who hold to 4.6 billion years trust that methods such as radiometric
dating are reliable, and that nothing has occurred in history that may have disrupted
the normal decay of radio-isotopes. Those who hold to 6,000 years trust that the Bible is true,
and that other factors explain the “apparent” age of the earth, such as the global flood,
or God creating the universe in a state that “appears” to give it an very long age. As an example,
God created Adam and Eve as fully-grown adult human beings. If a doctor were to have
examined Adam and Eve on the day of their creation, the doctor would have estimated their
age at 20 years (or whatever age they appeared to be) - when, in fact, Adam and Eve were
less than one day old. Whatever the case, it's always good reason to trust the Word of God over
the words of atheistic scientists with an evolutionary agenda.
Question: "Does Genesis chapter 1 literally mean 24-hour days?”
Answer: The English word "day" can mean more than one thing. It can refer to the 24-hour period of time that it takes for the earth to rotate on it's axis (i.e. "there are 24-hours in a day"). It can refer to the period of daylight between dawn and dusk (i.e. "it gets pretty hot during the day but it cools down a bit at night"). And it can refer to a unspecified period of time (i.e. "back in my Grandfather's day..."). Likewise, the Hebrew word "yom" (which translates into the English "day") can mean more than one thing. It is used to refer to a 24-hour period in Genesis 7:11. It is used to refer to the period of daylight between dawn and dusk in Genesis 1:16. And it is used to refer to an unspecified period of time in Genesis 2:4. So what does it mean in Genesis 1:5-2:2 when it's used in conjunction with ordinal numbers (i.e. " the first day, " & " the second day," & "the third day," & " the forth day," " the fifth day," " the sixth day," and "the seventh day")? Are these 24-hour periods or something else? Could "yom" as it is used here mean an unspecified period of time? How can we tell?
Yes we can determine how "yom" should be interpreted in Genesis 1:5-2:2 simply by examining the context in which we find the word used and then comparing it's context with how we see its usage elsewhere throughout scripture. By doing this we let Scripture interpret itself. Ken Ham of Answers in Genesis wrote a good article on this. It's published at - http://www.answersingenesis.org/cec/study_guides/answersSG2.pdf. Mr. Ham writes, "The Hebrew word for day (yom) is used 2301 times in the Old Testament. Outside of Genesis 1: Yom + ordinal number (used 410 times) always indicates an ordinary day [i.e. a 24-hour period]. The words ‘evening’ and ‘morning’ together (38 times) always indicate an ordinary day. Yom + ‘evening’ or ‘morning’ (23 times each) always indicates an ordinary day. Yom + ‘night’ (52 times) always indicates an ordinary day."
Now let’s look at the context in which we find the word "yom" used in Genesis 1:5-2:2...
Day 1 - "And God called the light 'day' [yom] and the darkness he called 'night.' So the EVENING and the MORNING were the FIRST DAY [yom]." (Genesis 1:5)
Day 2 - "So God called the firmament 'Heaven.' So the EVENING and the MORNING were the SECOND DAY [yom]." (Genesis 1:8)
Day 3 - "So the EVENING and the MORNING were the THIRD DAY [yom]." (Genesis 1:13)
Day 4 - "So the EVENING and the MORNING were the FOURTH DAY [yom]." (Genesis 1:19)
Day 5 - "So the EVENING and the MORNING were the FIFTH DAY [yom]." (Genesis 1:23)
Day 6 - "Then God saw everything that He had made, and indeed it was very good. So the EVENING and the MORNING were the SIXTH DAY [yom]." (Genesis 1:31)
Day 7 - "Thus the heavens and the earth, and all the host of them, were finished. And on the SEVENTH DAY [yom] God ended His work which He had done, and He rested on the SEVENTH DAY [yom] from all His work which He had done." (Genesis 2:1-2)
It is quite clear by the context that the Author of Genesis chapter 1 meant 24-hour periods. This was the standard interpretation up until the 1800s when a paradigm shift occurred within the scientific community and the Earth's sedimentary strata layers were reinterpreted. Whereas previously the rock layers were interpreted as evidence for Noah's flood, Noah's flood was thrown out by the scientific community and the rock layers were reinterpreted as evidence for an excessively old earth. Some well meaning but terribly mistaken Christians then sought to reconcile this new anti-Flood, ant-Bible interpretation with the Genesis 1 account by reinterpreting "yom" as meaning vast unspecified periods of time. This was a mistake.
The truth is, the evidences in favor of Noah's flood and a young earth far outnumber those in favor of an old earth and many of the old earth interpretations are known to rely upon faulty assumptions. Unfortunately the scientific community is entrenched on the matter and apparently they refuse to change their minds despite the weight of evidence contrary to their currently accepted paradigm. But please don't let their stubborn refusal influence how you read your Bible! According to Exodus 20:9-11, God used six literal days to create the world in order to serve as a model for man's work week. Work six days, rest one. Rest assured, God could have created everything in an instant if He wanted to. But apparently He had us in mind even before He made us (on the sixth day) and wanted to provide an example for us to follow
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Copyright = John Denton. Bible Research & Investigation Co.
URL web page address: http://www.ftech.net/~bric E Mail address: denton@bric.ftech.co.uk
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
" I love my work with a frenetic and perverse love, as an ascetic loves the hair shirt which scratches his belly." | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||


here is Garfield pretending to be an evolutionists... hehehe.. yes .. it is sad, but it is true



| It is not unseemly for a man to die fighting in defense of his country. Homer (900 BC-800 BC) |


The Ancient Forest. ( above ) Each Bristlecone pine, from young seedling to ancient relic, has an individual character. And in the Ancient Forest, where trees had more that four and a half millennia to develop their character, each tree is a true individual. Every single tree in the Ancient Forest is at least 4,000 years old, many reach 4,500 years and the oldest one – Methuselah – has a confirmed age of 4,767 years which secured its place in the Guinness Book of World Records.